Blue Blood is a 1951 American drama film directed by Lew Landers and written by Scott Darling. The film stars Bill Williams, Jane Nigh, Arthur Shields, Audrey Long, Harry Shannon and Lyle Talbot. The film was released on January 28, 1951, by Monogram Pictures.
Blue Blood (1951 film)

Keith Courage in Alpha Zones is a 1989 science fantasy action platform video game that was released by NEC for the TurboGrafx-16. It was the pack-in game for the console in North America. The video game was originally released in Japan by Hudson Soft on August 30, 1988 for the PC Engine (The TG-16's Japanese counterpart), under the title Mashin Eiyūden Wataru (魔神英雄伝ワタル) which is adapted from the anime television series of the same name (Spirit Hero Wataru). Hudson later released in 1990 another game for the Famicom based on the franchise titled Mashin Eiyuuden Wataru Gaiden Famicom, which is a role-playing video game.

Frank Barnitz (born March 17, 1968) is a Missouri farmer and former Democratic member of the Missouri State Senate. He is the owner and operator of Networth Feeds and Feeding, a custom feed mill, and manages Barnitz Farms in Lake Spring, Missouri.

Irina Alexandrovna Shmeleva (Russian: Ири́на Алекса́ндровна Шмелева) is an environmental psychologist, formerly Professor of the School of International Relations of St. Petersburg State University. Dr Shmeleva has authored several books on the psychology of ecological consciousness, sustainable development, sustainable urban development, cross-cultural psychology and numerous papers on international environmental policy, international relations, and environmental discourse.

Military installations closed in 1976

Blue Blood

{{Infobox football biography| name = Daniel Addo| image = | fullname = Daniel Addo| birth_date = 31 December 1994| birth_place = Accra, Ghana| height = 178 m (584 ft 0 in) Daniel Addo (born 31 December 1994) is a Ghanaian football defensive midfielder currently playing for from the . He previously played for Hacettepespor on loan from [VFB STUTTGART

Since about 1970, California has been experiencing an extended and increasing housing shortage, such that by 2018, California ranked 49th among the United States in housing units per resident. The shortage has been estimated at 3-4 million housing units (20-30% of California's housing stock, 14 million as of 2017). Experts say that California needs to double its current rate of housing production (85,000 units per year) just to keep up with expected population growth and prevent prices from further increasing, and needs to quadruple the current rate of housing production over the next 7 years in order for prices and rents to decline. The cause is the imbalance between supply and demand; a result of strong economic growth, in particular due to the San Francisco bay area technology industry creating hundreds of thousands of new jobs (which increases demand for housing) and the insufficient construction of new housing units to provide enough supply to meet the demand. The imbalance is such that in last half-decade, in the Bay Area, seven times as many jobs were created as housing units, while statewide, for every five new residents only one new housing unit was constructed. This has driven home prices and rents to extremely high levels, such that by 2017, the median price of a home across California was more than 2.5 times the median in the U.S. as a whole, and in California's coastal urban areas, (where the majority of job growth has occurred since the Great Recession), the shortages are even more dramatic. Several factors have together caused severe constraints on the construction of new housing: community involvement in the permitting process allows current residents who oppose new construction (often referred to as NIMBYs) to lobby their city council to deny new development; environmental laws are often abused by local residents and others to block or gain concessions from new development (making it more costly or too expensive to be profitable); greater local tax revenues from hotels, commercial, and retail development vs. residential incentivize cities to permit less residential; density restrictions (e.g. single-family zoning) and high land cost conspire to keep land and housing prices high; and construction costs are greater because of high impact fees, and often developments are only approved if union labor is used. The shortage is taking its toll on Californians in multiple ways: less than a third can afford a median priced home (whereas nationally, slightly more than half can), more than 20% of residents are in poverty (6% more than would be with lower housing costs), homelessness per capita is now the third highest in the nation, California's economy is suppressed by $150 - $400 billion annually (5-14%) (because of lost construction activity, and money that residents must spend on housing cannot be spent on other consumer goods), and the displacement and suburban sprawl caused by high housing costs in the urban centers (where jobs are located) has resulted in several of California's cities being home to the largest share of super commuters in the nation, as well as hindering California's ability to meet its CO2 emissions goals. In 2016, President Obama issued a report which recommended that cities across the nation with high housing costs follow California's lead on reforming land use regulations by adopting many of California's attempted solutions to its housing shortage, in order to enable the opportunity for people at all income levels to access the jobs being created in growing cities. Since then, the California legislature has passed several bills aimed at addressing the shortage: some reduced the fees and bureaucracy involved in creating ADU's, while others have added fees to real-estate document recording to be spent on low-income housing; yet even the most optimistic projections suggest that relative to the scope of the problem, these changes will only have minimal effect. In addition, two attempts to legalize higher density development close to public transit, (SB827 and its successor SB50), both of which received national attention, have failed in the legislature. In September 2019, the Council of Economic Advisers released a report which estimated that deregulating the housing market would lead to rents falling by 55% in San Francisco, 41% in Los Angeles, and 39% in San Diego.