Ra's-e Sharqi

Ra'annan Gissin

Sharon Turpin and Latif Siddiqui v Her Majesty The Queen

R v Smith, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915 is a leading decision on hearsay by the Supreme Court of Canada. This decision, along with R v Khan (1990), began what is called the "hearsay revolution", supplementing the traditional categorical approach to hearsay exceptions with a new "principled approach" based on reliability and necessity of testimony.

Criminal

R v Sullivan (Canada)

The Crown against Eli Waterfield

Ra' Diyaas ji was ruler of Junagadh in 1003-1010 AD. When king of Patan Durlabhsen Solanki attacks on junagadh but can not defeat the Fort of Uparkot , He sent His charan for get the Head of Ra' Diyaasji in donation, And Ra' Diyaas Donated his head to that Charan, Raa'Diyaas' and wife Somalde's son is Ra Navghan.

Chammak Challo

R v carroll

RaHoWa

R v W(D)

The Ra's Lanuf raid was a hit-and-run attack carried out in the early morning of 12 September 2011 by two groups of fighters loyal to Muammar Gaddafi in an apparently coordinated effort to disrupt oil refinery and export operations in the National Transitional Council-administered port town of Ra's Lanuf, Libya, during the Libyan Civil War.

R v Wigglesworth, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 541 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the constitutional right against double jeopardy under Section 11(h) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court gave a two-part test to determine whether a proceeding deals with a criminal matter.

William Wayne Dale Stillman v Her Majesty The Queen

Ra'is Kola

yes

R v Zinn, an important case in South African law, was heard in the Appellate Division on 6 December 1945, with judgment handed down on 13 March 1946. Watermeyer CJ, Tindall JA, Greenberg JA, Schreiner JA, and Davis AJA. NE Rosenberg KC (with him D. Gould) appeared for the appellant, and C. Norman Scoble, for the Crown.

R v Van der Peet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 507 is a leading case on Aboriginal rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Supreme Court held that Aboriginal fishing rights did not extend to commercial selling of fish. From this case came the Van der Peet test for determining if an Aboriginal right exists.
McLachlin J.

Shankar Mahadevan, Unni Menon, Mithoon

The RaLa Experiment, or RaLa, was a series of tests during and after the Manhattan Project designed to study the behavior of converging shock waves to achieve the spherical implosion necessary for compression of the plutonium pit of the nuclear weapon. The experiment used significant amounts of a short-lived radioisotope lanthanum-140, a potent source of gamma radiation; the RaLa is a contraction of Radioactive Lanthanum. The method was proposed by Robert Serber and developed by a team led by the Italian experimental physicist Bruno Rossi.The tests were performed with 1/8 inch (3.2 mm) spheres of radioactive lanthanum, equal to about 100 curies (3.7 TBq) and later 1,000 Ci (37 TBq), located in the center of a simulated nuclear device. The explosive lenses were designed primarily using this series of tests. Some 254 tests were conducted between September 1944 and March 1962. In his history of the Los Alamos project, David Hawkins wrote: “RaLa became the most important single experiment affecting the final bomb design”.

Ra's Abu Fintas

( did not take part in decision)

R v Shivpuri [1986] UKHL 2 is a House of Lords case in English law, on the issue of whether an offence which is impossible to commit amounts to a conviction of an attempt.

Ra's al-'Ayn Camps

R v Stillman

Ra. 1

R v Tang

None

RaFa

Ra's Lanuf Airport

Ra' Diyaasji

Ra's Lanuf clashes

Wilson J.

Vishal Dadlani, Shekhar Ravjiani, Nandini Srikar

Ra's Diba

*Battle of Karbala
*Battle of the Karbala Gap
*Battle of Baghdad

R v Storrey [1990] 1 S.C.R. 241 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the authority of police officers to make an arrest. The Court added another requirement that, in addition to an officer's subjective belief that there are reasonable and probable grounds for arrest, the grounds must be justifiable from an objective point of view.In his judgement, Cory J. followed R v Brown (1987 NSCA) and Liversidge v Anderson in stating:...the Criminal Code requires that an arresting officer must subjectively have reasonable and probable grounds on which to base the arrest. Those grounds must, in addition, be justifiable from an objective point of view. That is to say, a reasonable person placed in the position of the officer must be able to conclude that there were indeed reasonable and probable grounds for the arrest. On the other hand, the police need not demonstrate anything more than reasonable and probable grounds. Specifically they are not required to establish a prima facie case for conviction before making the arrest.

Ra'ash Shvi'it (earthquake)

R v Soqokomashe and Others

R v Stephens (1866) LR 1 QB 702 is an English criminal law, land law and UK public law case decided by the Queen's Bench that applied a strict liability standard to the violation of a criminal statute prohibiting the dumping of refuse into a river.

Akon, Vishal Dadlani, Shruti Pathak

Appeal dismissed

Joseph Colin Strachan v Her Majesty The Queen

Unknown*

"Ra-Ta Ta-Ta"

Ra'na language

Ra-Herakty

R v Wigglesworth

About 60 refinery workers

Ra'is of the Palestinian Authority

R v Sussex Justices, ex p McCarthy

Ra.One is the soundtrack album, composed by the duo Vishal–Shekhar, to the 2011 Indian science fiction film of the same name, written and directed by Anubhav Sinha, and starring Shahrukh Khan, Kareena Kapoor, Armaan Verma and Arjun Rampal in the lead roles. It also stars Shahana Goswami, Dalip Tahil and Chinese-American actor Tom Wu in supporting roles, along with Rajinikanth, Sanjay Dutt and Priyanka Chopra making guest appearances.

Ra-oh

R v Wray, [1971] S.C.R. 272 is a famous pre-Charter decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence. The Court, following the English common law established in Kuruma v R, [1955] A.C. 197 (P.C.), held that judges had no discretion to exclude evidence whose admission would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.The police arrested Wray in connection with a murder.

I'm On

McLachlin and Stevenson JJ.

Ra's Alghoul

[2005] 1 WLR 661, [2005] UKHL 9, [2005] 1 All ER 782, [2005] 2 Cr App R 8

Vishal-Shekhar

R v Special Adjudicator, ex p Ullah

Appeal dismissed.

RaHoWa (band)

R v Woodrow

Ra'ad ALCM

R v Symonds

Lord Parker CJ, Ashworth and Hinchcliffe JJ.

RaCl2

R v Smith (1992)

Ra.one

Ra'is Yahya

Ra-ngae

R v Walker

*One NTC source claimed 15 loyalists were killed and 10 captured, but later reports made no mention of pro-Gaddafi losses

R with stroke (majuscule: Ɍ, minuscule: ɍ) is a letter of the Latin alphabet, derived from R with the addition of a bar through the letter. It is used in the Kanuri language. It should not be confused with ℞, a symbol used for medical prescriptions.

R v Shivpuri

R v Sparrow

Ra's al Kaima

R v U (FJ) is a leading case of the Supreme Court of Canada. In the decision the court modified the requirements of admissibility of prior statements. In R v B (KG), the court required that prior statements can only be admitted for the truth of its contents where it was under oath and videotaped. In UFJ, the court permitted a less strict standard.

Moldaver and Karakatsanis JJ.

Ra's-e Jonubi

L'Heureux‑Dubé J.

Nuvve Naa Chammak Challo

RaC7

R v Stone, [1999] 2 S.C.R. 290 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the use of the defence of automatism in a criminal trial.

Ra'is el-Tahrir

"Ra-Ta Ta-Ta" is a song by Finnish singer Anna Abreu from her fifth studio album, V (2014). Abreu co-wrote the song with Jonas Karlsson and Hank Solo, who also produced the track. "Ra-Ta Ta-Ta" is a Pop song with the Dance elements that Abreu has become famous for since the Now era of 2008. The song was released on 1 April 2014 in Finland, as the album's lead single. It marked Abreu's first release under her new recording contract with Warner Bros. Records, and her first release since returning from hiatus after promotion for her Greatest Hits compilation album ended in early 2012.

Ra'isi

Ra'fat Ali Jabr

Ra-223

R v Turcotte

RaFD

inline,title

R v Williams

Ra'iyyat Mahalleh

'’Rascals''

Ra's Lanuf raid

Ra'ad

Ra'iz, Iran

Muthada Chammak Challo

Gaddafi Loyalists
* Paramilitary forces

Ra3

The Crown against Steane

Hamid Hassy

*St. Thomas Aquinas
*Iona
*Northwood

Poo Ulagama

Fadl-Allah Haroun

Ra's al Khaimah

Ra-ngae District

R v Steyn (1954), an important case in South African criminal procedure, dealt with an application for leave to appeal against a judgment of the High Court of Southern Rhodesia, dismissing an appeal from a decision by a magistrate, in which he convicted the applicant of the crime of theft as defined by the Stock and Produce Theft Repression Act.The court held that the basic rule was that the police docket and contents thereof were privileged and the defense is not entitled to access to it.Therefore, when statements were procured from witnesses for the purpose that what they said would be given in evidence in a lawsuit that was contemplated, these statements were protected against disclosure until at least the conclusion of the proceedings, which would include any appeal or similar step after the decision in the court of first instance.This protection against disclosure applied in both civil and criminal trials.There was, however, an ethical rule which obliged the prosecutor to disclose if a witness deviated from his original statement.Where there was a serious discrepancy between the proof of a Crown witness and what he said on oath at the trial, the prosecutor must direct attention to that fact and, unless there was special and cogent reason to the contrary, make the statement available for cross-examination.This approach, which applied in South Africa before the advent of its new constitutional dispensation, has been described as "trial by ambush."

Ra's Al Ghul

Ra'avan

Ra'is Kala

Her Majesty the Queen v Thomas Turcotte

Ra:IN (band)

Dorman Thomas Skinner v Her Majesty The Queen

December 2009

R v Steane 1947 KB 997 is a case decided by the English Court of Criminal Appeal on appeal from the Central Criminal Court examining the nature of intent in establishing criminal liability.

Ra1 may refer to :-Ra.One, a 2011 Hindi science fiction film starring Shahrukh Khan, Kareena Kapoor and Arjun Rampal.Command and Conquer: Red Alert, a strategy computer game developed by Westwood Studios.

Hamdani in 2009

Ra-harakhty

Owen Lloyd Swain v Her Majesty The Queen

Pachai Poove

Christian Wirth (born in the 1970s), better known by the pseudonym RaD Man, is an American computer artist and historian.

Her Majesty the Queen, Respondent vs Cheong Wang, Appellant

Libya

Pop, Dance

Ra's as-Khaimah

R v Smith (1900)

R v James, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 669

R v Skinner

Ra.One

[1987] 3 All ER 411; 78 Cr App R 276

Appeal allowed and proceedings stayed.

R v Tessling [2004] 3 S.C.R. 432, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court held that the use of thermal imaging by police in the course of an investigation of a suspect's property did not constitute a violation of the accused's right to a reasonable expectation of privacy under section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

R v Van der Peet

Naresh Iyer

Ra's Al-Khaymah

Her Majesty The Queen v Yat Fung Albert Tse, Nhan Trong Ly, Viet Bac Nguyen, Huong Dac Doan, Daniel Luis Soux and Myles Alexander Vandrick

Esmond Faulks

R vinay kumar

Asphalt

Ra'fat Ali Jabr (born 20 May 1975) is a retired Jordanian football player of Palestinian origin, who played as an attacking midfielder for Al-Wahdat SC.To many fans of Al-Wahdat, he is known as (Arabic:"الفنان") "Al-Fanan" and Picasso due to his great performances, assists, and goal scoring record.

R v U (FJ)

R v Starr [2000] 2 S.C.R. 144 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision that re-evaluated several principles of evidence. In particular, they held that the "principled approach" hearsay evidence under R v Khan and R v Smith (1992) can be equally used to exclude otherwise admissible hearsay evidence. In addition, the Court examined the judge's charge to the jury on the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.

Alaano Ilaano

RaC5

force

Ra's Abu Fintas is a settlement in Qatar, located in the municipality of Umm Salal.

Ra8293

Claire L’Heureux‑Dubé, Charles Gonthier, Peter Cory, Beverley McLachlin, Frank Iacobucci, John C. Major, Michel Bastarache and Ian Binnie JJ.

"Right In Front Of You"

Ra'hel Bluwstein

R wave

Ra'ad Majid Rashid al-Hamdani

Gonthier J.

R v Tse

Country

Lamer J.

R v Stevens, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 1153, was a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada rendered on June 30, 1988, concerning the retrospective application of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Ra's Nasrani

Judgment against the Crown in the British Columbia Court of Appeal.

Lamer and L'Heureux-Dubé JJ.

R. v. Waterfield

R v Vaillancourt, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 636, is a landmark case from the Supreme Court of Canada on the constitutionality of the Criminal Code concept of "constructive murder". The Court ruled that crimes with significant "stigma" attached, such as murder, require proof of the mens rea element of subjective foresight of death, and therefore the provision of the Criminal Code for constructive murder was unconstitutional.

Ra'anan Cohen

Ra's al ghul

In R v Verity-Amm, V was charged with driving a motor car recklessly or negligently in contravention of the Motor Vehicles Ordinance. Before the trial, V requested details of the alleged negligence but was refused such particulars. Before V pleaded, he applied to the court for further particulars and this application was also refused.

Track listing

MacLachlin J.

Ra's Lanuf Airport is an airport in the Sirte District of Libya, located approximately 227 km south-southwest of Benghazi. Its primary use is the transportation of oilfield workers from production facilities in the area.

*Pro-Gaddafi saboteurs damage oil facilities

Ra'isabad

on appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario

Ra's Al Khaymah

L’Heureux‑Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin , Iacobucci, Major , Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour and LeBel JJ.

Strachan's appeal was dismissed.

Muban

R v Sullivan [1984] AC 156 is a British House of Lords case in criminal law, and a leading modern authority on the common law defence of insanity.

Abella

Regina v Wang (2005) is a legal case, in the criminal law in England and Wales, establishing that a judge in England or in Wales is not entitled to direct, or instruct, order or require, a jury to return a verdict of guilty.

Ra-Ta Ta-Ta

Vishal Dadlani

R v U (FJ) is a leading case of the Supreme Court of Canada. In the decision the court modified the requirements of admissibility of prior statements. In R v B (KG), the court required that prior statements can only be admitted for the truth of its contents where it was under oath and videotaped. In UFJ, the court permitted a less strict standard. The complainants prior statement was admitted for the truth of its contents without being under oath or videotaped where the statement was corroborated by the accused confession. The enhanced reliability of the corroboration and the opportunity to cross-examine the recanting witness was sufficient to remove much of the dangers associated with prior statements.

R v Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy ([1924] 1 KB 256, [1923] All ER Rep 233) is a leading English case on the impartiality and recusal of judges. It is famous for its precedence in establishing the principle that the mere appearance of bias is sufficient to overturn a judicial decision. It also brought into common parlance the oft-quoted aphorism "Not only must Justice be done; it must also be seen to be done."

R v Wells

Soundtrack

Location of Ra's Lanuf Airport, Libya

Unknown number of fighters

Seat

Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Chouinard*, Lamer, Wilson, Le Dain and La Forest JJ.

R v Sullivan

Vishal Dadlani, Shekhar Ravjiani
Ulagam Ulagam

Unanimous decision by: Binnie

RaLa

"Ra-Ta Ta-Ta" is a song by Finnish singer Anna Abreu from her fifth studio album, V (2014). Abreu co-wrote the song with Jonas Karlsson and Hank Solo, who also produced the track. "Ra-Ta Ta-Ta" is a Pop song with the Dance elements that Abreu has become famous for since the Now era of 2008. The song was released on 1 April 2014 in Finland, as the album's lead single. It marked Abreu's first release under her new recording contract with Warner Bros.

Anderton v Ryan [1985] AC 560; R v Hussain [1969] 2 QB 567

R v Strachan

Van Den Heever JA

R v Shelembe is an important case in South African criminal law, heard in the Natal Provincial Division, by Selke AJP and Kennedy J, on August 22, 1955. DJH Niehaus appeared for the accused, at the request of the court; EA Logie appeared for the Crown. Judgment came down on August 30.The case revolved around a charge of malicious injury to property, where the accused, endeavouring to escape from a room into which he had broken, broke in a two a locked door.

R v Tang [2008] HCA 39; (2008) 237 CLR 1 is a landmark Australian judgment of the High Court. The matter related to Wei Tang, the operator of a Melbourne brothel, convicted for slavery. The case was the first criminal conviction for a slavery offence in Australia and was significant for establishing the modern legal definition of slavery and has been described as the most crucial test of the effectiveness of our criminal laws against … slavery ever to come before an Australian court.

The emergency wiretap provisions of the Criminal Code (Canada), which permits wiretaps in certain situations without prior judicial authorization, infringes section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and cannot be justified under section 1 of the Charter, since there are no accountability measures.

R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy

* [1924] KB 256
* [1923] EWHC KB 1

Ra-Ra Zoo was an English-based new circus theatre company active (1984–1994), a seminal group who created self devised physical theatre performance for theatres using comedy and circus skills.Started by Sue Broadway, Stephen Kent, David Spathaky and Sue Bradley while they were all working and staying together at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe in August 1984.They first performed in public at the infamous Tunnel Club hosted by Malcolm Hardee in the East End of London.

Ra'Shad James

Ra's al-'Ayn District

Ra's al-Kaymah

Ra's Al Kaima

*Anti-Gaddafi forces drive off attackers

Binnie J.

Anti-Gaddafi forces
*National Liberation Army

R v Stone

Ra'iz

Beverley McLachlin C.J.

James Warren Wells v Her Majesty The Queen

Lord Lane Justice Skinner and Mr. Justice McCowan

Ra'fat Ali

Robert Dennis Starr v Her Majesty The Queen

R v Therens [1985] 1 S.C.R. 613 is an early Supreme Court of Canada decision on an accused's right to retain and instruct counsel without delay under section 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court held that section 235(1) of the Criminal Code, which allowed a police officer to demand a breathalyzer test, violated the accused's right to retain counsel.

Sopinka, Iacobucci and Major JJ.

R v Tessling

R v Starr
Major, Binnie, Arbour and Lebel JJ.

Up to 150 fighters

Ra-Ra Zoo

R with hook

Ra: Raw

The RaLa Experiment, or RaLa, was a series of tests during and after the Manhattan Project designed to study the behavior of converging shock waves to achieve the spherical implosion necessary for compression of the plutonium pit of the nuclear weapon. The experiment used significant amounts of a short-lived radioisotope lanthanum-140, a potent source of gamma radiation; the RaLa is a contraction of Radioactive Lanthanum.

R v Shein is an important case in South African law, heard in the Appellate Division, Bloemfontein, on 15 September 1924, with judgment handed down on 3 October. Innes CJ, Solomon JA, De Villiers JA, Kotz JA and Wessels JA presided. The court found that the evidence on which a jury is entitled to convict upon a criminal charge is evidence on which reasonable men could properly convict. If the evidence produced cannot be so described, the court will set aside the verdict not as deciding the facts itself, but because the jury has not, in its opinion, duly discharged the judicial duty cast upon it. If, on the other hand, the evidence does answer to that description, the court will refuse to interfere, not because it would have come to the same conclusion itself, but because no ground exists for interference with the discharge of a duty entrusted by law to the jury alone.

ระแงะ

Ra-Hoor-Khut

Ra'zac (Inheritance)

Dickson C.J. and Beetz, McIntyre, Lamer and La Forest JJ.

Ra'ouf mus'ad

right

Ra'dabad

La Forest and Sopinka JJ.

R v Storrey

British Columbia Court of Appeal in favour of the Crown

R v Swain

Beetz J.

Ra's al Khaymah

Ra'iātea

Lamer C.J.

Ra’ouf Mus'ad (sometimes known as Raouf Moussad-Basta) is a playwright, journalist and novelist who was born in Sudan to Coptic parents from Egypt. He moved to Egypt as a teenager and lived in various countries, both in the Middle East and in Europe, during the past 30 years. He has now settled in Amsterdam with his Dutch wife and their children and has taken Dutch nationality.

Judgment for the Crown in the Court of Appeal for British Columbia.

Ra-ngae (Thai: ระแงะ) is a district (amphoe) in the center of Narathiwat Province, southern Thailand.

RaCFToD

R v Wang

رعد مجيد الحمداني

Instrumental

RaCUYA

Akon, Hamsika Iyer

Christian Wirth

Sandramlaa

Ra-Oh

Sukhwinder Singh, Vishal Dadlani

HLNF

R v Turpin, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1296 is a constitutional case of the Supreme Court of Canada on the right to trial by jury. The Court held that the requirement for a murder trial to be conducted in front of a judge and jury did not violate the right to trial by jury under s 11(f) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, nor the equality guarantee under s 15 of the Charter.

R v Victor

Vishal–Shekhar

Intent; Duress; Motive

Ra-Ni

Ra'ad al-Hamdani

Ra's al-Ghul

Assault; Cars; Police officers; Police powers; Search and seizure

Ra'zac (Inheritance trilogy)

Split decision in the Court of Appeal for British Columbia.

Major J.

Appeal and cross appeal dismissed

Le Dain, McIntyre and Sopinka JJ.

Ra-Hoor-Khu-it

Song of the End

R v Special Adjudicator

Antonio Lamer C.J. /Beverley McLachlin C.J.

R v Zikalala

Williams [1987]

Regina and Shivpuri

R v Tse is a Supreme Court of Canada decision regarding the constitutionality of warrant-less wiretaps in emergency situations. The Court found that the emergency wiretap provisions found in section 184.4 of the Criminal Code infringes the search and seizure rights in section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and cannot be justified as a reasonable limitation under section 1 of the Charter, due to the lack of accountability measures.

L’Heureux‑Dubé J.

Iacobucci J.

YRF Studios, Mumbai

Dickson, Estey, Wilson J.

Estey and Le Dain JJ.

Panchhi Javolni

RaLa experiment

Martin CJ and Chapman J

R v Shelembe

Glenn Brian Stevens v Her Majesty The Queen

R v Zinn

Cromwell J

Ra's Lanuf, Libya

House of Lords

R v Symonds (The Queen v Symonds) incorporated the concept of Aboriginal title into New Zealand law and upheld the Government's pre-emptive right of purchase to Maori land deriving from the common law and expressed in the Treaty of Waitangi. Although the Native Lands Act 1862 waived Crown pre-emption, the notion of Aboriginal title has been revived in the 20th century to deal with Maori property rights.

Ra2

Em Naatone

Ra, Fiji

Mistake of Fact, Reasonableness

R. v. Lifchus, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 320

R v Wells is a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada with respect to sentencing principles set out in s 718.2(e) of the Criminal Code, relating to Aboriginal offenders. The decision clarified the principles set out in the Court's earlier decision in R v Gladue.

RaCFQfB

Accused appeal dismissed

R williams parry

Composite

Jiya Mora Ghabraaye

R v Turpin

Tambon

The King v. Sussex Justices. Ex parte McCarthy

Lord Hailsham LC, Lord Elwyn-Jones, Lord Scarman, Lord Bridge and Lord Mackay

R v Vaillancourt

Akon, Shankar Mahadevan, Shalini Singh

R v Spencer is a Canadian constitutional law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, concerning search and seizure law under section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. At issue was whether the police could request subscriber information associated with an IP address from an Internet service provider, on a voluntary basis under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, and without prior judicial authorisation. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the request for an IP address infringed the Charter's guarantee against unreasonable search and seizure.

Region

15-17 fighters killed, 2 workers wounded

Ra'avad

Le Dain J.

R v Williams (Gladstone)

Ronald Percy Storrey, Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen, Respondent

راس لانوف

R v Sparrow, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1075 was an important decision of the Supreme Court of Canada concerning the application of Aboriginal rights under section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Court held that Aboriginal rights, such as fishing, that were in existence in 1982 are protected under the Constitution of Canada and cannot be infringed without justification on account of the government's fiduciary duty to the Aboriginal peoples of Canada.

Mistake, Attempt

Ra'ad 1

November 1950

Amphoe 9605.svg

Wang, R. v [2003] EWCA Crim 3228

Ra'ad Majid Rashid al-Hamdani (Arabic: رعد مجيد الحمداني‎‎) was a General of the Iraqi Republican Guard, and was one of Saddam Hussein's favourite officers.

Ra'

Ra'in Qal'eh

American

→ Kuwait

R v Stevens

Ra's al-Khaymah)

Bhare Naina

Ra'is

La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, Iacobucci and Major JJ.

R v Viljoen is an important case in South African law. It was heard in the Appellate Division on 23 April 1941, with judgment handed down on 6 May. De Wet CJ, Watermeyer JA, Tindall JA, Centlivres JA, and Feetham JA presided.

R v Walker was an English Crown Court case that was a test of the Obscene Publications Act 1959. It was the first such prosecution involving written material in nearly two decades and set a precedent for using the act to prosecute web fiction. In December 2009, the defendant, English Civil Servant Darryn Walker was charged with publishing an obscene story on the Internet contrary to Section 2(1) of the Act.

Rex v Victor

Court of Criminal Appeal

The Queen at the suit of Charles Hunter McIntosh v John Jeremyn Symonds

Ra-Harachte

Regina v Darryn Walker

Estey J.

R v Viljoen

The RA-4 is an Egyptian weapon which may be used as an assault rifle, sniper rifle and grenade launcher.

Ra's Al Ghoul

R v hinks

Metropolitan Police Act 1839 s. 66;

Club Mix

R v Spencer

R v Turcotte, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 519 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the common law right to silence and the conditions to waive that right.

Ra'kat

Their Lordships determined that there are no circumstances in which a judge is entitled to direct a jury to return a verdict of guilty. The appeal was ALLOWED and the conviction of the defendant was QUASHED.

Ra-Horus

Ra'uf

RaC6

Ra's Lanuf

Christian Wirth (born in the 1970s), better known by the pseudonym RaD Man, is an American computer artist and historian. He works in the field of ANSI art, a method of creating art using a limited set of text characters and color escape codes based loosely on the relevant ANSI standard (X3.64: Control Sequences for Video Terminals and Peripherals).RaD Man was initially involved with the Aces of ANSI Art (AAA), an organization which created ANSI artwork for a number of computer bulletin board systems in the late 1980s. With others, he created the "ANSI Creators in Demand" group (also known as ACiD).Starting in 1990, ACiD released artwork on an ad hoc network of BBSes, updating a collection of art known as the ACiD Acquisition by sending a compressed file of all the completed work up to that time. By 1992, the increasing file size made this process impractical, and this led to the development of the artpack, where groups of artists (including ACiD) would upload monthly update packages instead. In early 2004, RaD Man directed and produced ACiD Acquisition Update #100, colloquially known as "ACiD-100, the final artpack released by ACiD as a group.In 1996, RaD Man founded the ACiD Artpacks Archive to collect the artpacks created by the hundreds of groups that followed in ACiD's footsteps. This collection eventually was transferred to DVD as Dark Domain: the artpacks.acid.org collection in 2004.Since 2002, RaD Man has worked as a historian and spokesperson for the artscene, collecting information and interviews with the artists involved, and creating reports and presentations on the lineage of computer art. Some of this work includes The ARTS], a talk radio show which discusses the many different facets of the creative computer underground scenes and the Pilgrimage 2004 demoparty.In 2006, RaD Man became a member of cDc's Ninja Strike Force.In 2007, he co-founded Blockparty with Jason Scott, a North American demoparty. The event was produced in cooperation with Notacon and took place annually in Cleveland, Ohio, from 2007–2010.In November 2009, ANSI art group Blocktronics paid tribute to RaD Man and his contributions to the ANSI art scene by releasing an artpack titled "Codename Chris Wirth".

R. v. Legere , 89 N.B.R. 361; R. v. Paul , 155 N.B.R. 195

Ra's Diba is the name of a cape in Fujairah.

Ra'isi Yahya

Raftaarein

R v Wallace (1931) 23 Cr App R 32 is a leading English criminal case, famous as being the first occasion that a conviction for murder was overturned on the grounds that the verdict was "unreasonable, or cannot be supported, having regard to the evidence", as provided for by Section 4(1) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1907.William Herbert Wallace, a 52-year-old insurance agent, had been convicted at the Liverpool Assizes in 1931 of the brutal murder of his wife, Julia Wallace, and sentenced to death.

R v Walker was an English Crown Court case that was a test of the Obscene Publications Act 1959. It was the first such prosecution involving written material in nearly two decades and set a precedent for using the act to prosecute web fiction. In December 2009, the defendant, English Civil Servant Darryn Walker was charged with publishing an obscene story on the Internet contrary to Section 2(1) of the Act. Media controversy was generated because the story in question was a real person fiction text horror story describing the imagined murder of the members of British pop group Girls Aloud. The case was abruptly abandoned on its first day and the defendant was cleared of all charges.

Rex v Zikalala is an important case in South African criminal law, heard on February 27, 1953. Zikalala, the appellant, had been charged and convicted of the culpable homicide in causing the death of one Alpheus Tsele. On appeal to the Appellate Division, he successfully argued self-defence.

Ra-ra skirt

Users have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their Internet service provider subscriber information, as its disclosure will often identify users with intimate or sensitive activities carried out online with the expectation of anonymity.
APPEAL from , affirming in part and setting aside in part . Leave to appeal granted,

L'Heureux-Dubé J.

R v Waterfield [1963] 3 All E.R. 659 is a leading English Court of Appeal decision establishing the common law authority of a police officer to stop and detain individuals.This case produced what is known as the waterfield test (also called the common law "ancillary power doctrine") to determine the limit of police authority to interfere with a person's liberty or property.

Ra'in

Ra.One (soundtrack)

R. v. Smith (Thomas Joseph) [1959] 2 QB 35, [1959] A.C. is an English criminal law case, dealing with causation and homicide. The court ruled that negligence of medical staff does not break the chain of causation in murder cases.The victim was stabbed, but the attending doctor did not realise the full extent of his injuries, causing death.The court said that the stabbing was still the 'operating' cause of death, and therefore the defendant is guilty.

R v Skinner, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1235, is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Ra's Al-Khaimah

R. v. Sparrow, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1075

"Be With You"

RaD Man

R v Steane

Dickson C.J., Beetz, McIntyre, Le Dain and La Forest JJ.

Ra-yu

R v Smith

Ra-Shalom

R v Tse is a Supreme Court of Canada decision regarding the constitutionality of warrant-less wiretaps in emergency situations. The Court found that the emergency wiretap provisions found in section 184.4 of the Criminal Code infringes the search and seizure rights in section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and cannot be justified as a reasonable limitation under section 1 of the Charter, due to the lack of accountability measures. In addition to the two parties to the case (the Attorney General of British Columbia and the various defendants), the Court heard from the following interveners: the Attorney General of Canada, the Attorney General of Ontario, the Attorney General of Quebec, the Criminal Lawyers' Association (Ontario), the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association. The unanimous decision of the Court was the first Supreme Court of Canada decision written by Moldaver and Karakatsanis JJ.

Ra-Ta-Ta (Chris Juwens song)

Akon, Hamsika Iyer, Vishal Dadlani

McLachlin C.J.

Ra'am

R vulgaris

En Uyir

A fetus is not a person regarding the negligence law in the Criminal Code.

Ra-Ta-Ta

R v Wolverhampton City Council, ex p Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd

Ra'if Badawi

R v Spencer is a Canadian constitutional law decision of the Supreme Court of Canada, concerning search and seizure law under section 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. At issue was whether the police could request subscriber information associated with an IP address from an Internet service provider, on a voluntary basis under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, and without prior judicial authorisation.

Smecky Music Studios, Prague

Ra'annana

Government

Ra's

Dildaara

Maritz J and Millin J

Ra'ft Ali

"Ra-Ta-Ta", or "Ra Ta-Ta-Ta" is a 1970 German song written by Hamburg pianist Chris Juwens (real name Uwe Stelzmann; 1946-1998) and Christian Heilburg (real name Gregor Rottschalk, *01/12/1945). Gunter Gabriel of CBS Records Germany immediately recognised the song's catchy potential but was overruled by his boss. Nevertheless the song swept across Europe with singles in many other European languages.

International

R v Smith is an important case in South African criminal law, especially on the defence of obedience to orders. The court adopted what has since been described as "a middle course" between, on the one hand, the view "that the subordinate has a duty of blind obedience to her superior’s order", and, on the other, the view "that the fact that the subordinate obeyed an order is not a ground of justification". The court described these as the “two extreme propositions of law”, and opted for a middle course by adopting and applying the following rule: A soldier is compelled to obey an order only if the order is manifestly lawful. If it is manifestly unlawful, she may not obey it; if she does, she acts unlawfully. This test has been applied in later South African decisions. According to CR Snyman,The middle-course approach was obviously favoured by the compilers of the Constitution, because section 199(6) of the Constitution provides that no member of any security service may obey a manifestly illegal order.

Ra'ouf Mus'ad

Ra-226

Yvan Vaillancourt v Her Majesty The Queen

Amphoe location in Narathiwat Province

Ra-Herekhty

Chinmayi

Ra-Ta Ta-Ta (Anna Abreu song)

RaF: CaW

Ronald Edward Sparrow v Her Majesty The Queen

R v Whitfield (1969), [1970] S.C.R. 46 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the legal requirements of an arrest under the Criminal Code.

Remix

Rex v Zikalala

Cory, J.

Ra'd

Vishal–Shekhar, Abhijit Nalani, Abhijit Vaghani, Giorgio Tuinfort, John Stewart
Right By Your Side

R v Therens

bottom

Ra'Shad James (born January 26, 1990) is an American professional basketball player for Cedevita Zagreb of the Croatian League. He played college basketball for St. Thomas Aquinas, Iona and Northwood.

Ra-4

Amphoe established

Ra'iatea

Dickson C.J.

R v Shipley

Sources: Google Maps

Religions

High Court of Justice

Ra's al-Khaimah

Ra's Al-Kaima

( hearing only, rehearing only)

(Chouinard took no part in judgment)

Ra'Meghan Val'Norium

R v askov

Ra'is of Manurqa

In R v Verity-Amm, V was charged with driving a motor car recklessly or negligently in contravention of the Motor Vehicles Ordinance. Before the trial, V requested details of the alleged negligence but was refused such particulars. Before V pleaded, he applied to the court for further particulars and this application was also refused. V was convicted of the charge.The magistrate stated in his reasons for judgment that he had refused to order particulars to be given because the charge had followed the wording of the section creating the offense, and he was therefore not entitled to order particulars.He stated further that the appellant was not prejudiced, because the grounds of negligence upon which the Crown relied had emerged clearly from the evidence, and the appellant had had ample opportunity of preparing his defense during the period of the remand.The court on appeal held that on a charge of driving a motor vehicle recklessly or negligently, the accused is entitled to be informed of the particulars of the alleged negligence if he asks for them.Furthermore, it was held that where a court has, on improper grounds, refused to order particulars to be given to an accused in a case where such particulars ought to have been given, the prejudice to the accused is not necessarily cured by postponing the hearing at the conclusion of the Crown case so as to enable the accused to prepare his defense, because the accused will probably have been prejudiced in his cross-examination of the Crown witnesses if he was not fully acquainted with the case he had to meet.The appeal succeeded and the conviction and sentence was set aside.This case was decided under the old Criminal Procedure Act of 1917 which also provided that in charges of contravening a statutory enactment, it shall be sufficient if the description of the offense is in the words of the enactment and that it does not prevent the court from ordering particulars of the offense to be given by the Crown to the accused in a proper case.

Skinner appeal allowed

La Forest J.

Her Majesty The Queen v Arthur Larry Smith

Ra-Ta-Ta (Rotation song)

Her Majesty the Queen v Wang

Road Traffic Act 1960 s. 223

The Dirty Picture

Ra-Tim-Bum Castle

Lord Hewart CJ, Lush and Sankey JJ

R v Wray

Singer

R word

Dickson C.J. and La Forest J

R v Smith (Thomas Joseph)

The appeal should be dismissed.

R v Shelembe is an important case in South African criminal law, heard in the Natal Provincial Division, by Selke AJP and Kennedy J, on August 22, 1955. DJH Niehaus appeared for the accused, at the request of the court; EA Logie appeared for the Crown. Judgment came down on August 30.The case revolved around a charge of malicious injury to property, where the accused, endeavouring to escape from a room into which he had broken, broke in a two a locked door. Since the accused had also been charged and convicted of housebreaking with intent to commit a crime to the prosecutor unknown, the question arose: Was there a splitting of charges? The court held that breaking into a room and breaking out of it are two separate and distinct incidents. There had, therefore, not been a splitting of charges.

Judgment for the Crown in the New Brunswick Court of Appeal

Centlivres CJ, Schreiner JA and Van Den Heever JA

R. v. Collins, [1987] 1 S.C.R. 265

Williams (Gladstone) was a case heard in the UK Court of Appeal in 1983 and established that a mistake of fact can be a successful defence regardless of whether the belief is reasonable or not.

R v Smithers

Indecisive
*Pro-Gaddafi saboteurs damage oil facilities
*Anti-Gaddafi forces drive off attackers

Ra.One is the soundtrack album, composed by the duo Vishal–Shekhar, to the 2011 Indian science fiction film of the same name, written and directed by Anubhav Sinha, and starring Shahrukh Khan, Kareena Kapoor, Armaan Verma and Arjun Rampal in the lead roles. It also stars Shahana Goswami, Dalip Tahil and Chinese-American actor Tom Wu in supporting roles, along with Rajinikanth, Sanjay Dutt and Priyanka Chopra making guest appearances. The film is jointly produced by Eros International and Khan's production company, Red Chillies Entertainment, and was originally scheduled to release on 3 June 2011. However, due to extensive post-production work involving special effects and the 3D conversion, its release was postponed, and saw a worldwide opening during the Diwali weekend of 26 October 2011. The album features fifteen tracks, and was released on 12 September 2011 by T-Series.
Yarukum Nenje
HindiTeluguTamil

Ra-hoor-khuit

Emirate

R v Verity-Amm

Ra'anan Gissin

Ra.One accolades

The governments of Canada have a fiduciary relationship with Aboriginals under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982; any denial of Aboriginal rights under section 35 must be justified, and Aboriginal rights must be given priority.

R wz. 42

Criminal law, Traffic offences, Negligence, Involuntary action, Automatism, Epilepsy

Civil

Mary C Sullivan and Gloria J Lemay v Her Majesty The Queen

Dickson

R v Van der Peet, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 507 is a leading case on Aboriginal rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Supreme Court held that Aboriginal fishing rights did not extend to commercial selling of fish. From this case came the Van der Peet test for determining if an Aboriginal right exists. This is the first of three cases known as the Van der Peet trilogy which included R v NTC Smokehouse Ltd and R v Gladstone.Dorothy Van der Peet, a member of the Stó:lō Nation, was charged for selling salmon that Steven and Charles Jimmy (Charles being her common-law husband) had lawfully caught under the native food fish licence but was forbidden from selling.At trial, the judge held that the Aboriginal right to fish for food and ceremonial purposes did not extend to the right to sell fish commercially. A summary appeal judge overturned the verdict, but it was subsequently overturned at the British Columbia Court of Appeal.The issue before the Court was whether the law preventing sale of the fish infringed Van der Peet's Aboriginal rights under section 35.

Ra-Ra Zoo was an English-based new circus theatre company active (1984–1994), a seminal group who created self devised physical theatre performance for theatres using comedy and circus skills.Started by Sue Broadway, Stephen Kent, David Spathaky and Sue Bradley while they were all working and staying together at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe in August 1984.They first performed in public at the infamous Tunnel Club hosted by Malcolm Hardee in the East End of London. The normally vocal audience were unusually silenced by a wordless version of their signature teacup act.They opened their first full show at the Battersea Arts Centre as part of the London International Mime Festival in January 1985 their first theatres show 'Juggling With A Social Conscience'.They subsequently toured internationally for ten years playing in theatres notable to Africa, South America, Australia and extensively in Europe. Their show under the joint Artistic Direction of David Spathaky and Sue Broadway combined the ethos of 'alternative' comedy of the 1980 with a 1970s revival of Circus skills, variously called 'Neo or New Circus' which largely promoted a reinvention of circus focusing on human skill and generally without presenting animal acts. Their background in street performing Amazing Mendezies and in the influential Circus Oz (of which Sue Broadway was a founding member) gave the show an irreverent, fast paced, surrealist feel.

Shankar Mahadevan

R v Steyn

R v Waterfield

RaMA

Van der Peet appeal dismissed

RaCGC

Punjabi Mix

R v Shein

Ra'ash-Mens Rights In The Family

Ra1a

RaLa Experiment

R v Whitfield

Dorothy Marie Van der Peet v Her Majesty The Queen

Ra'avyah

Judgment for the Crown in the Court of Appeal for Ontario

R v Stephens

Tanyong Mat

Dr Ra'anan Cohen (Hebrew: רענן כהן‎‎, born 28 February 1941) is a former Israeli politician who served as a government minister during the early 2000s.

Ra's Lanuf Oil & Gas Processing Company

Vanchichina

R v Smith is an important case in South African criminal law, especially on the defence of obedience to orders. The court adopted what has since been described as "a middle course" between, on the one hand, the view "that the subordinate has a duty of blind obedience to her superior’s order", and, on the other, the view "that the fact that the subordinate obeyed an order is not a ground of justification".

Ra'shan

R v Wray, [1971] S.C.R. 272 is a famous pre-Charter decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the exclusion of improperly obtained evidence. The Court, following the English common law established in Kuruma v R, [1955] A.C. 197 (P.C.), held that judges had no discretion to exclude evidence whose admission would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.The police arrested Wray in connection with a murder. Through the use of forceful interrogation techniques they managed to get inculpatory information from him and had him show the police where he left evidence of his crime.At trial the judge held that the evidence must be excluded.Martland, with Fauteux, Abbott, Ritchie, and Pigeon concurring, held that the judge did not have the discretion to exclude the evidence. They distinguished between unfair methods of collecting evidence, which should never be the basis of evidence exclusion, and unfair trial process, which should always result in exclusion of evidence. Neither of these two cases could be subject to any discretion.In dissent, Cartwright found that all the precedents pointed to a common notion that the accused cannot be forced to self-incriminate, which implied that a judge would necessarily require discretion on the exclusion of evidence.

R v Shein is an important case in South African law, heard in the Appellate Division, Bloemfontein, on 15 September 1924, with judgment handed down on 3 October. Innes CJ, Solomon JA, De Villiers JA, Kotz JA and Wessels JA presided. The court found that the evidence on which a jury is entitled to convict upon a criminal charge is evidence on which reasonable men could properly convict.

R v Swain, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 933 is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on certain rights of the mentally ill in their criminal defence. The case concerned a constitutional challenge of the common law rule permitting the Crown to adduce evidence of an accused's insanity and section 542(2) of the Criminal Code, which allowed for the indeterminate detention of an accused who is found not guilty by reason of "insanity". The Court held that both the common law rule and the Code provision were unconstitutional. As a result, the Court created a new common law rule that was constitutional, and Parliament created new laws of what to do with individuals who were found not criminally responsible by reason of a mental disorder. The parties to the case were the appellant, Swain, the respondent, the Crown, and the following interveners: the Attorney General of Canada, the Lieutenant Governor's Board of Review of Ontario, the Canadian Disability Rights Council, the Canadian Mental Health Association, and the Canadian Association for Community Living.

Criminal procedure, Appeal, Conviction, Culpable homicide, Reasonable doubt, Self defence

Defence (General) Regulations, 1939, Reg. 2a

R v Stillman [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607, 1997 SCC 32 was a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on section 24(2) of the Constitution of Canada which allowed for the exclusion of evidence that is obtained in a manner that infringes the Charter. The two-step Stillman test was developed for determining whether the admission of evidence that was obtained through a breach of a Charter right would affect the fairness of the trial. The issue of trial fairness comes into play when applying the first step of the Collins test to exclude evidence under section 24(2).The case would later be replaced by the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in R. v. Grant.

Sopinka and Cory JJ.

Ra-Tet

O Priyatama

Bastarache J.

RaBr2

R v Strachan, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 980 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the exclusion of evidence under section 24(2) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms subsequent to a violation of a Charter right. The Court held that there does not need to be a causal connection between the violation and the evidence, but rather there need only be a temporal link between the two.
Beetz, McIntyre, La Forest and L'Heureux‑Dubé JJ.

Imperial

Jonas Karlsson, Hank Solo, Anna Abreu

Road Traffic Act 1960 s. 2;

"Ra-Ta-Ta", or "Ra Ta-Ta-Ta" is a 1970 German song written by Hamburg pianist Chris Juwens (real name Uwe Stelzmann; 1946-1998) and Christian Heilburg (real name Gregor Rottschalk, *01/12/1945). Gunter Gabriel of CBS Records Germany immediately recognised the song's catchy potential but was overruled by his boss. Nevertheless the song swept across Europe with singles in many other European languages. The Top 10 success of singer Antoine's French version in Paris led to promotion of an English version by German band Rotation in the US.

Unknown

Siddharth Coutto

R v Sullivan, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 489 was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on negligence and whether a partially born fetus is a person.

Bert Thomas Stone v Her Majesty the Queen

Location in Libya

R v Woolin

R values

Ra'ah

Town

Her Majesty The Queen v. Walter Tessling

Jonas Karlsson, Hank Solo

R v Storrey [1990] 1 S.C.R. 241 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the authority of police officers to make an arrest. The Court added another requirement that, in addition to an officer's subjective belief that there are reasonable and probable grounds for arrest, the grounds must be justifiable from an objective point of view.In his judgement, Cory J.

R with stroke

Goddard, CJ

Akon

[1991] 1 SCR 489, 1991 CanLII 85, 63 CCC 97, 3 CR 277, 55 BCLR 1

Ra'ad bin Zeid

Ra1

Ra'ama

Ra'îs of Manûrqa

Matthew David Spencer v Her Majesty The Queen

R v Swain, [1991] 1 S.C.R. 933 is a leading constitutional decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on certain rights of the mentally ill in their criminal defence. The case concerned a constitutional challenge of the common law rule permitting the Crown to adduce evidence of an accused's insanity and section 542(2) of the Criminal Code, which allowed for the indeterminate detention of an accused who is found not guilty by reason of "insanity".

Cory J.

CD single, digital download

Cedevita Zagreb

Ra-Ra Zoo - English based Circus Theatre Company 1983 - 1994

United Arab Emirates

Ra-Hoor-Khuit

Ra's al-Khaymah

police use of FLIR imaging technology does not constitute a violation of right against unreasonable search under section 8 of the Charter

Ra'isvand

Ra-Son Warrior

Ra'i

Ethnicities

McIntyre J.

Wilson, La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Stevenson JJ.

Ra'anana, Israel

R v Wallace

R v Stillman [1997] 1 S.C.R. 607, 1997 SCC 32 was a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on section 24(2) of the Constitution of Canada which allowed for the exclusion of evidence that is obtained in a manner that infringes the Charter. The two-step Stillman test was developed for determining whether the admission of evidence that was obtained through a breach of a Charter right would affect the fairness of the trial.

Ra's al Ghoul

NZPCC 388

Reference re ss. 193 and 195.1 of the Criminal Code , [1990] 1 S.C.R. 000

Offences against the Person Act 1861 s. 38;

Comes The Light