Judicature Acts
wiki page modified: 2017-02-05T22:37:10Z
subject: Category:Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom
wiki page edit link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicature_Acts&action=edit
wiki page length: 17963
wiki page revision link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicature_Acts&oldid=763906313
subject: Category:Civil procedure
wiki page ID: 695514
asmade: yes
subject: Category:1870s in the United Kingdom
wiki page out degree: 81
title: Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1891
path: ukpga/Vict/54-55/53/enacted
short title: Judicature Acts
territorial extent: England and Wales
parliament: Parliament of the United Kingdom
subject: Category:Courts of England and Wales
wiki page revision ID: 763906313
subject: Category:English law
wiki page history link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicature_Acts&action=history

Judicature Acts
language: en
primary topic: Judicature Acts
contributor: Cydebot
type: Document

Judica-Cordiglia brothers
wiki page length: 10027
subject: Category:Manned space program of the Soviet Union
abstract: The Judica-Cordiglia brothers are two Italian former amateur radio operators who made audio recordings that allegedly support the conspiracy theory that the Soviet space program covered up cosmonaut deaths in the 1960s. The pair claimed to have acquired recordings of several secret Soviet space missions that ended in tragedy and mystery. This has generated public interest for more than 50 years, despite there being a large number of detailed rebuttals to the brothers' claims.
wiki page out degree: 38
wiki page revision link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judica-Cordiglia_brothers&oldid=771078732
subject: Category:Amateur astronomers
subject: Category:Living people
subject: Category:1939 births
subject: Category:Conspiracy theories
wiki page history link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judica-Cordiglia_brothers&action=history
wiki page revision ID: 771078732
wiki page ID: 2803856
subject: Category:1933 births
subject: Category:Sibling duos
wiki page modified: 2017-03-19T11:49:17Z
wiki page edit link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judica-Cordiglia_brothers&action=edit
subject: Category:European amateur radio operators

Judicial Code of 1911
subject: Category:1911 in American law
subject: Category:United States federal judiciary legislation
wiki page revision ID: 764453525
abstract: The Judicial Code of 1911 (Pub.L. 61–475, 36 Stat. 1087, enacted March 3, 1911) abolished the United States circuit courts and transferred their trial jurisdiction to the U.S. district courts.In 1911, the United States Congress created a single code encompassing all statutes related to the judiciary and took the opportunity to revise and unify existing laws. At the same time, Congress abolished the U.S. circuit courts as of January 1, 1912, the effective date of the statute. Established by the Judiciary Act of 1789, the circuit courts served as the most important trial courts of the federal judiciary for over a century. The circuit courts lost their limited appellate jurisdiction in the Judiciary Act of 1891, which created the U.S. courts of appeals, but as part of the political compromise behind the 1891 Act, the circuit courts continued to serve as trial courts alongside the district courts for the next 20 years. By abolishing the circuit courts and transferring their jurisdiction and pending business to the district courts, Congress instituted a judicial system with a single type of trial court and eliminated the inefficiencies associated with administering two types of court that were often presided over by the same judge.The remainder of the Judicial Code of 1911 was not so much a reorganization of the structure or procedures of the federal courts as it was a standardization of law governing the judiciary. Over more than 120 years, many contradictory statutes had accumulated through legislation approved for the purpose of organizing individual courts. Congress had first gathered the statutes related to the judiciary into a single code in the Revised Statutes adopted in 1874, but the resulting Title XIII preserved all of the legislation then in effect without reconciling the varying rules and court structures that often applied to the same types of courts in different parts of the country. In 1899, Congress appointed a commission to recommend revisions in the ju[cell cut: 3392 characters, first 2000 kept]
article: The Judicial Code of 1911 and the abolition of the U.S. Circuit Courts
url: http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/landmark_13.html
subject: Category:United States civil procedure
comment: The Judicial Code of 1911 (Pub.L. 61–475, 36 Stat. 1087, enacted March 3, 1911) abolished the United States circuit courts and transferred their trial jurisdiction to the U.S. district courts.In 1911, the United States Congress created a single code encompassing all statutes related to the judiciary and took the opportunity to revise and unify existing laws. At the same time, Congress abolished the U.S. circuit courts as of January 1, 1912, the effective date of the statute.
wiki page out degree: 22
wiki page history link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicial_Code_of_1911&action=history
wiki page modified: 2017-02-09T00:35:28Z
wiki page ID: 36526629
wiki page length: 4786
subject: Category:61st United States Congress
wiki page revision link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicial_Code_of_1911&oldid=764453525
wiki page edit link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicial_Code_of_1911&action=edit
subject: Category:History of the United States government
agency: Federal Judicial Center

Judicial aspects of race in the United States
abstract: Race legislation in the United States is defined as legislation seeking to direct relations between so-called "races" (a social construct) or ethnic groups. It has had several historical phases in the United States, developing from the European colonization of the Americas, the triangular slave trade, and the American Indian Wars. The 1776 Declaration of Independence included the statement that "all men are created equal," which has ultimately inspired actions and legislation against slavery and racial discrimination. Such actions have led to passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the United States Constitution.The first period extends until the Civil War and the Reconstruction era, the second spans the nadir of American race relations period through the early 20th century; the last period begins with World War II and the following increased civil rights movement, leading to the repeal of racial segregation laws. Race legislation has been intertwined with immigration laws, which sometimes included specific provisions against particular nationalities or ethnicities (i.e. Chinese Exclusion Act or 1923 United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind case).
wiki page history link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicial_aspects_of_race_in_the_United_States&action=history
wiki page revision ID: 763596254
wiki page ID: 10501905
wiki page length: 27681
wiki page edit link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicial_aspects_of_race_in_the_United_States&action=edit
wiki page out degree: 198
wiki page modified: 2017-02-04T02:35:40Z
wiki page revision link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicial_aspects_of_race_in_the_United_States&oldid=763596254
comment: Race legislation in the United States is defined as legislation seeking to direct relations between so-called "races" (a social construct) or ethnic groups. It has had several historical phases in the United States, developing from the European colonization of the Americas, the triangular slave trade, and the American Indian Wars.
subject: Category:Race legislation in the United States

Judicial interpretation
abstract: Judicial interpretation are different ways the judiciary uses to interpret the law, particularly constitutional documents and legislation. This is an impactful problem in many common law jurisdictions, such as the United States, Australia or Canada because the supreme courts of those nations can overturn laws made by their individual legislatures via judicial review.For example, the United States Supreme Court has decided such topics as the legality of slavery as in the Dred Scott decision, desegregation as in the Brown v Board of Education decision, and abortion rights as in the Roe v Wade decision. As a result, how justices interpret the constitution, and the ways in which they approach this task, has a political aspect. Terms describing types of judicial interpretation can be ambiguous; for example, the term judicial conservatism can vary in meaning depending on what is trying to be "conserved". One can look at judicial interpretation along a continuum from judicial restraint to judicial activism, with different viewpoints along the continuum.
wiki page revision link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicial_interpretation&oldid=764227244
subject: Category:Legal reasoning
wiki page edit link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicial_interpretation&action=edit
wiki page modified: 2017-02-07T19:35:40Z
wiki page ID: 30870726
wiki page revision ID: 764227244
wiki page length: 6284
wiki page history link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicial_interpretation&action=history
comment: Judicial interpretation are different ways the judiciary uses to interpret the law, particularly constitutional documents and legislation.
wiki page out degree: 45
subject: Category:Interpretation (philosophy)
subject: Category:Judiciaries

Judicial appointment history for United States federal courts
wiki page length: 58886
subject: Category:Lists of United States judicial appointments by president
wiki page history link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicial_appointment_history_for_United_States_federal_courts&action=history
wiki page edit link: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Judicial_appointment_history_for_United_States_federal_courts&action=edit
wiki page ID: 2069311
abstract: The appointment of federal judges for United States federal courts has become viewed as a political process in the last several decades. This is especially true of U.S. Supreme Court and court of appeals appointments. The tables below provide the composition of the Supreme and circuit courts at the end of each four year presidential term, categorizing the judges by the presidential term during which they were nominated for their seat.As of March 2014 a majority of the federal appeals courts have a majority of Democratic appointees. However, the party of the president who appointed a judge is not always a good indicator of that judge's judicial philosophy and place on the political spectrum.
wiki page out degree: 73
subject: Category:Legal history of the United States
subject: Category:Nomination and appointment of United States federal judges
comment: The appointment of federal judges for United States federal courts has become viewed as a political process in the last several decades. This is especially true of U.S. Supreme Court and court of appeals appointments.

Judicial interpretation
primary topic: Judicial interpretation
language: en
type: Document

Judica-Cordiglia brothers
type: Document
primary topic: Judica-Cordiglia brothers
language: en

Judicial aspects of race in the United States
contributor: Lmauldwin
type: Document
language: en
primary topic: Judicial aspects of race in the United States

Lmauldwin
contributor ID: 30174201

Judicial appointment history for United States federal courts
language: en
type: Document
primary topic: Judicial appointment history for United States federal courts

TJRC
contributor ID: 4033135

Judicial Code of 1911
contributor: TJRC
language: en
primary topic: Judicial Code of 1911
type: Document

Cydebot
contributor ID: 1215485